scientist do the famous magic trick know as the Gallic drop for three species of rascal and chance one find out mightily through it . Crucially , the deviation was not in the animals ’ eye , but in their hand . Those with opposable pollex like our own were taken in by the carrying out , sharing our prospect of how the actions would play out , while those that want thumb did n’t see the point .

Entertaining primatesat zoosbyperforming magic trickshas become a Youtube phenomenon . Scientists have realized this wholesome hobby could alsohelp our understandingof the working of beast ’ brain . The theme has also yielded perceptivity into the thought process of trickster chick like theEurasian jay .

Now the same team has moved on to stuffy congenator of ours . Led by magician and animal cognition investigator Dr Elias Garcia - Pelegrin of the University of Cambridge , a raw paper has been published on the results of his witching caper performed on New World monkeys .

Like a million budding conjuror hop to wow their parents , Garcia - Pelegrin prove the monkeys the classical French Drop : coin on one medallion , he grab it with a 2d handwriting while shroud his pollex . The grownup reveal shows that the coin is not in the second handwriting , where humans would expect it , but is in fact cover in the first .

A skilled hustler can make human eyes abide by the second hand in the expectation the coin will be there . However , a key part of the deception is hiding the ovolo of the second hired man in such a way that the interview thinks it is holding the coin . Garcia - Pelegrin enquire if this would bring on less thumb - dependent animals .

To ensure the monkey focused , Garcia - Pelegrin replace the coin with their preferred food and had the subjects choose which hand they believe was holding the food for thought . Correct pick were rewarded .

Capuchin scamp , which crack nutsusing toolsheld between pollex and finger , picked the wrong hand for the peanut 81 percent of the time , indicating first moment alike to ours .

Marmosets ' thumbs are really just another finger , a major hindrance to world mastery , leading them to pull ahead their prized marshmallow 94 pct of the time . Perhaps they wonder why these stupefied man were setting them such an easy trial .

Squirrel monkeys make up an intermediary grammatical case . They do n’t have as much control of their thumbs as capuchin or humans and ca n’t execute preciseness traveling bag , but were more easily fooled , winning their mealworm in only 7 percent of trials . Maybe possess a less sophisticated digit makes one particularly likely to be fooled by its whoremonger .

The results roughly reversed when the magician twice - bluffed , actually taking the coin into the 2nd handwriting .

“ By investigating how species of primates experience magic , we can understand more about the evolutionary roots of cognitive shortcomings that provide us discover to the craftiness of magicians , ” Garcia - Pelegrin enunciate in astatement .

The finding are relevant not only for understand the monkey brain , but our own . “ There is increasing grounds that the same parts of the nervous arrangement used when we perform an action are also activate when we watch that action perform by others , ” articulate senior author Professor Nicola Clayton . “ It ’s about the incarnation of noesis . How one ’s finger and quarter round move helps forge the means we think . ”

The subject certainly seems to confirm that . The squad provide further grounds by make a pan - primate witching trick they call the “ Power Drop ” open of being do by the hand of any of the monkeys in the bailiwick . This time all three specie were fooled most of the sentence .

“ Our employment raises the intriguing hypothesis that an someone ’s inherent physical potentiality heavily mold their perception , their retentiveness of what they think they run across , and their power to predict manual movements of those around them , ” Clayton said .

The study is published inCurrent Biology .